Do You Have A Valid Personal Injury Claim On Your Hands?

29 January 2018
 Categories: , Blog

Share

Being involved in a personal injury case can be quite emotionally and financially draining. It is not surprising that a majority of people will just choose to settle out of court so that they can avoid the rigours of having to follow up on getting adequate compensation. However, this defeatist approach is what makes it difficult for the victims to receive what is wholly owed to them. As a result, the liable parties get off scotch free and only pay a fraction of what the damages they have caused cost. You may think that hiring a personal injury lawyer is exorbitant, but these litigators would be your best bet to acquiring what is owed to you. Read on to know whether you have a valid personal injury claim on your hands and pursue it with a lawyer by your side.

You have proof of injury

One aspect of personal injury cases that you may be unaware of is that they can become long drawn out in court. However, even if your case is heard after several months have passed, you would need to prove that you acquired a legitimate injury. There are various ways of procuring this evidence. Firstly, it would be advisable to take any photographic evidence of the physical injuries before they heal. Secondly, it would be imperative to collect witness testimonies while the incident is still fresh in their minds so that there are no contradicting pieces to the story. Lastly, make sure that you see a medical professional who can ascertain that you acquired either physical or psychological harm from the incident.

You have proof of negligence

Another critical factor that would contribute to you having a valid personal injury claim is when you can prove that negligence was involved in your incident. There are a couple of things that you would have to ascertain to prove negligence. Firstly, you would need to illustrate that the liable party neglected their duty to provide you with the required care. For example, you would have to show that a doctor went against their oath of not doing any harm and this resulted in your injury. On the other hand, if this were a motor vehicle case, you would have to prove that the liable motorist did not adhere to the traffic rules and this subsequently led to you becoming injured. The second thing that you would have to prove to show negligence is by illustrating the recoverable damages that you sustained due to this oversight. For example, if a motorist jumped a red light, you would have to prove that this action is what led to you getting into an auto accident.